There are seven components of existentialism. Explanation:
I often wonder what the meaning of life really is. How do the choices I make affect me and those around me? Do I really have the freedom to do what I want, without fear of alienation? Knowing full well that the choices I make may bring to light the awareness of my own mortality and yet keep me free from despair, will automatically affect the choices I make. My identity is so closely intertwined with those around me that it is impossible for me to make any choices solely for myself. Therefore, I do not have freedom of choice. The meaning of my life is the freedom to do the right thing for all those for whom I am responsible. I do, however, have the freedom to look back at what I said and realize the inauthenticity of it all.
chat soon
xoxo
It's not much, really. Just the strange ramblings of my mind. Feel free to read. Feel free to comment. I don't mind. Makes me feel important.....
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Monday, December 12, 2005
The Tree-Fall
So, the age-old question: If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it does it still make a sound???
I think the philosopher David Hume would love this riddle since he was known as “The Scottish Skeptic” and he is not a big believer in cause and effect, as we all understand it.
Using Hume’s theory on cause and effect, I looked at this riddle. If we take for granted that the future will resemble the past, then we can assume that someone being there to hear does not determine whether or not a falling tree makes a sound. It will make a sound, because it always has in the past.
Looking at this logically, if
tree-fall #1, positive sound
tree-fall #2, positive sound
tree-fall #3, positive sound
tree-fall #50, positive sound
tree-fall #5001, positive sound
Is it therefore reasonable to assume that the falling tree will always make a sound? Whether or not there is ever a quiet tree fall does not negate the fact that I am justified in theorizing that all tree falls will make a sound.
There. Done. I want to hear no more about this subject.
chat soon.
xoxo
I think the philosopher David Hume would love this riddle since he was known as “The Scottish Skeptic” and he is not a big believer in cause and effect, as we all understand it.
Using Hume’s theory on cause and effect, I looked at this riddle. If we take for granted that the future will resemble the past, then we can assume that someone being there to hear does not determine whether or not a falling tree makes a sound. It will make a sound, because it always has in the past.
Looking at this logically, if
tree-fall #1, positive sound
tree-fall #2, positive sound
tree-fall #3, positive sound
tree-fall #50, positive sound
tree-fall #5001, positive sound
Is it therefore reasonable to assume that the falling tree will always make a sound? Whether or not there is ever a quiet tree fall does not negate the fact that I am justified in theorizing that all tree falls will make a sound.
There. Done. I want to hear no more about this subject.
chat soon.
xoxo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)